Comparison · MySQL vs Postgres
Postgres vs MySQL for a new SaaS: which should you pick?
TL;DR
For greenfield SaaS in 2026, Postgres is the safer default — better JSON support, native vector search via pgvector, a richer extension ecosystem, and the de-facto pairing with modern hosted platforms like Supabase and Neon. MySQL still wins on teams with deep MySQL operational experience, read-heavy workloads with simple schemas, and inherited LAMP-stack codebases. For any product that already uses or might use AI features, Postgres is the call.
How they compare, dimension by dimension
MySQL (or MariaDB) versus PostgreSQL — eight to nine dimensions that actually change the decision.
| Dimension | MySQL | Postgres | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| JSON / semi-structured data | JSON column, limited indexing | JSONB with full GIN indexing | → |
| Vector search for AIDecisive if you ship any LLM-touched feature. | No native option | pgvector — first-class extension | → |
| Read throughput at scale | Legendary, well-tuned | Comparable on modern Postgres | = |
| Extension ecosystem | Limited | PostGIS, pg_trgm, TimescaleDB, pgvector, ... | → |
| Managed hosting options | RDS, PlanetScale, Cloud SQL | Supabase, Neon, RDS, Railway, Render | → |
| Operational complexity | Fewer knobs, simpler tuning | More to learn (vacuum, MVCC) | ← |
| License | GPL (Oracle-owned) | PostgreSQL license (permissive) | → |
| Default in modern SaaS stacks | Rare in new builds | Dominant in 2026 | → |
When to pick which
Pick MySQL if
- Your team has deep MySQL operational experience and switching cost is real.
- You are inheriting a WordPress, classic LAMP, or PHP codebase.
- Workload is read-heavy with a simple relational schema and no JSON or AI features in scope.
- You specifically want PlanetScale’s branching workflow.
Pick Postgres if
- The product uses or might use AI features — embeddings, vector search, RAG.
- You want JSONB to handle semi-structured data without a separate NoSQL store.
- You are shipping on Supabase, Neon, or Railway (Postgres-native platforms).
- You want geospatial (PostGIS), time-series (TimescaleDB), or full-text search built in.
Our take
For greenfield SaaS in 2026 we default to Postgres on Supabase or Neon. The deciding factor is rarely MySQL doing something wrong; it is Postgres’ ecosystem doing more things right for the kinds of work AI-touched products need. The exception we make: a team with deep MySQL ops experience inheriting a codebase that already runs on it — switching costs are not worth chasing a marginal feature lead.
Common questions
- Is Postgres slower than MySQL?
- That was true fifteen years ago and is not meaningfully true now for OLTP workloads. Modern Postgres on a managed host with sensible indexes hits application bottlenecks before the database becomes the constraint.
- Why did Supabase pick Postgres?
- JSONB plus Row-Level Security plus the extension ecosystem — especially pgvector. Their auth, storage, and realtime products all map onto Postgres primitives, which lets the whole platform stay coherent.
- What about MongoDB?
- Different question. NoSQL is the right call for unbounded-schema document workloads — not for SaaS-typical user, account, and billing data. For most products, Postgres with JSONB columns gives you 90% of MongoDB’s flexibility while keeping relational guarantees.
- Is MySQL safer because Oracle backs it?
- In practice no. Postgres’ development community is broader and less exposed to single-vendor decisions. MariaDB exists for teams who want a fork that is Oracle-independent.
- Which does Creative Brain Inc. default to?
- Postgres on Supabase for new SaaS builds. We use Supabase auth, storage, and realtime against the same database, which keeps the stack consistent. Migrating to RDS later is a database dump, not a rewrite.